![]() ![]() In my synaptic I see 4 different options for GUIs that you can install without getting exotic and adding additional software sources: I personally don't like running GUIs on servers because they do use some RAM even when idling, but to each their own. If installing a GUI on your server would be beneficial and help your team be productive, then you won't hurt a thing by doing so. GUIs do use system resources, but not much, especially when the DE is idling, and especially on a system with hundreds of GBs of RAM and a dual socket motherboard. ![]() Since they point at the same repositories, it would be absolutely fine to do a sudo apt install ubuntu-desktop on a server system in order to get a GUI up and running. The server and desktop editions run on the same base and pull from the same repositories, they're just pre-configured differently out of the box. I am coming from no linux experience, so to see this sort of server with gui specific comment is very alarming. ![]() Would it be beneficial at all to install ubuntu server and then the gui over the top, or is the full gui version of ubuntu fully capable as server OS, just bloated and prettier? There will be sufficient headroom built into all aspects of resources. Even if they use a bit, that's fine too, I would willingly give 4-8GB RAM overall, which is waaaay too much, but I really don't want that call. Is this applicable to a purpose built machine, something like 36 bay supermicro with top line dual processor/128GB/256GB RAM, or is this only relative to minimum spec boxes?Īlso, is this happening when these heavy packages (mediaplayer/browser/etc) aren't open, or only when they need processing? If they don't use resources other than disk space, no big deal. Some reports are as high as 50-60% resources used by gui alone. In my research I've only seen absolutely negative things about the gui resource use. What does bother me is getting a call because youtube/dropbox doesn't work on the server and they didn't want to leave the machine room. I don't want light versions of applications, if they get distracted and watch youtube videos, dropbox uploads, email or whatever they do while at the server that does not bother me whatsoever. I understand this is a server and it should be bare bones for performance, but I have a situation where this server might be administered occasionally by a non-technical person that is not comfortable whatsoever with command-line. I have a question about the resources needed by GUI. I've been researching for my first linux deployment and I have settled on Ubuntu/GlusterFS for a high performance file server. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |